So, with a bit of free time today, I had to test a lens that I'm selling on eBay. This should enable me to show the difference between lit and natural light shots.
For today's exercise, I used a Canon EOS 5D Mark II with the Contax Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* f/2.8 lens. It's actually a fantastic portrait lens, but I didn't have anybody around, so I'd have to settle for some object.
Here is the natural light shot:
And here are two shots that were lit by a single light. That was a Vivitar 285 at 1/4 power coming from camera left.
These shots were processed the same way. Not a whole lot into it, but I shot these in RAW, so it needed some sharpening and a little tiny bit of adding fill light to bring out some details. I kept the amounts the same though.
So while the natural light shot is not bad (or at least, I think), I prefer the punch of the lit shot and that the background is not blown out.
But that's just me.
Oh .. and if you're interested in this lens, you can find it here:
ReplyDeletehttp://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300512311305&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT
I prefer the natural shot, but to each their own. The bottom one is nice too... looks like water in the background.
ReplyDelete